Michigan Redneck II

Where Politics and Rockabilly Become Strangely Fused

Would Barry Goldwater Be Called a RINO, in Modern Times?

That is a question I have been asking myself lately, for about the past couple months. I had kinda heard about Barry Goldwater in passing, but never too many details about him. From different blurbs on the i-net, it seems that he was very strong in fiscal conservative principles. He was a strong advocate of liberty. He was against government intervention into peoples lives. But it seems he was not a big fan of social conservatism. In this day and age where social conservatism seems to overtake fiscal conservatism, I can’t help but wonder how he would be viewed.

I want to learn more about Barry Goldwater, so I am taking some time to learn more about him and relay the info that I find to y’all. I will try to keep the blog up to date in my research. I want to check my library to see if they have a copy of Conscience of a Conservative the book written by Mr. Goldwater. From editor and reader reviews, this book seems as though it would be relevant today. This quote;

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. -Barry Goldwater (1964 Republican Convention Acceptance Speech)

is the premise of this blog.

Barry Goldwater may have lost the 1964 Election, but he was by no means a loser…

May 1, 2009 - Posted by michiganredneck | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

6 Comments »

  1. Barry Goldwater was awesome! I highly recommend just buying “The Conscience of a Conservative,” instead of finding it at the library. It’s a book every conservative, heck, every American should own! Get a cheap used copy on Amazon.

    While written almost 50 years ago, you’ll be amazed at how accurately it describes today’s politics. He talks about the moderate “me-too” candidates, and all the other mainstream topics of today. The book is as timely today, as it was when first published in 1960.

    Barry was from the Old Right, where freedom and liberty trumped everything else. Goldwater spoke his mind, but wasn’t the radical he’s been painted to be. In fact, it was the Republican establishment who did most of the damage to him in his presidential campaign. They didn’t want him to win because they wanted another “me-too” candidate in office, regardless of party affiliation.

    I also highly recommend Goldwater’s book “With No Apologies,” and for further perspective, read Phyllis Schlafley’s “A Choice Not An Echo.” Enjoy!

    Comment by theCL | May 1, 2009 | Reply

  2. Actually, I think I may end up ordering from Amazon, or ebay. ‘Til then, I may just borrow a library copy, while I wait.

    I have already read his acceptance speech from ‘64, twice. And it is so relevant today. Could we say that about McCain’s speech 45+ years from now? Prolly not. Too pop culture-y, trying to be “one of us.” I’ll take “freedom and liberty” as catch phrases over “family values” “it’s the economy stupid” and “hope and change”!

    Anyways, thanx for the info.

    Comment by michiganredneck | May 1, 2009 | Reply

  3. Could we say that about McCain’s speech 45+ years from now?

    Nope. Unfortunately, after his brave defense of our nation, he came home and became a Statist.

    Comment by theCL | May 2, 2009 | Reply

  4. The Republican Liberty Caucus of Michigan addressed this same point re: Goldwater and the RINO definition. Too often “RINO immunity” is granted to politicians such as Thad McCotter is they receive the Right to Life endorsement. But, there is no fiscal equivalent currently to Right to Life to take politicians such as McCotter to task for his support of S-Chip (government health insurance for kids) and Card-Check.

    Comment by Dan Sheill | May 3, 2009 | Reply

  5. Hi Dan,

    Thank you for stopping by and giving your input. I am still learning about Barry Goldwater. From what I have been reading, and will soon post, there was no better Conservative the Republican Party has ever had! I have read that he was a strong opponent of welfare. I read the transcript of the speech where Ronald Reagan endorsed him. Ronald Reagan was strong against welfare. Say what you may about Richard Nixon, but when he was in Congress, he saw and spoke about the devastation of welfare. All these guys back in the day HATED government programs and nanny statism. How did the Republican Party get so soft?
    I know that Goldwater was pro-choice. I myself am pro-life. I would like to see Roe v. Wade reversed. Then put the abortion issue back to church moral issues, in the church, not politics. I have nothing against Right to Life organizations. But it seems that if a Republican is not pro-life but fiscally conservative, he is called a RINO. But if he is pro-life but not fiscally conservative, he is a “true conservative.” The religious right talks about bringing the Republican Party “back to it’s Evangelical roots.” Problem is, the Republican Party existed over 100 years before the Evangalical movement into the party.

    Comment by michiganredneck | May 3, 2009 | Reply

  6. “To disagree, one doesn’t have to be disagreeable.”

    Comment by Barry Goldwater | July 30, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment